2. An East Kent Perspective

 

2.1 The East Kent market

The four East Kent authorities border the districts of Swale and Ashford. They cover an area of 420 square miles and have a combined population of 463,000.

 

Although there are considerable variations within East Kent, generally speaking, it is characterised by:

 

  • Relatively low land values compared with the rest of the South East (less so for areas such as Canterbury and Sandwich)
  • Common coastal characteristics – poor quality housing, low levels of investment, high levels of private rented accommodation, economic and social decline
  • An ageing population, with higher than average numbers of older people
  • A higher than average number of vulnerable people
  • A low skill, low wage economy that is perceived as less dynamic than other parts of Kent.

 

75% of East Kent’s 196,000 homes are owner-occupied. 12% are rented from the local authorities or a Registered Social Landlord (RSL). The remaining 13% are rented in the private sector.

 

East Kent Market

 

2.2 Affordable housing

Within East Kent, it is the local authorities that are the major social landlords with a combined total of 16,709 affordable homes. RSLs provide a further 10,000 affordable homes.

 

However, the Right to Buy has seen stock levels across East Kent decline significantly (see Table 2), and a disproportionate number of two and three-bedroom homes have been sold over the last 28 years (the East Kent authorities owned approximately 30,000 homes in 1980). 


Table 2 - Right to Buy sales for five years to March 2008

Year

Canterbury

Dover

Shepway

Thanet

Total

2002-03

94

122

84

77

377

2003-04

72

144

79

71

366

2004-05

41

65

26

46

178

2005-06

18

27

18

24

87

2006-07

23

24

18

23

88

2007-2008

20

22

1

17

60

Total

268

404

226

258

1156

 

This situation has been compounded by the comparatively low number of new affordable homes provided by RSLs in East Kent over the last six years (See Table 3).

 

Table 3 - RSL completions for five years to March 2008

 

Year

Canterbury

Dover

Shepway

Thanet

Total

2002-03

31

18

21

20

90

2003-04

53

29

84

12

178

2004-05

53

65

58

12

188

2005-06

42

26

40

53

161

2006-07

56

64

16

31

167

2007-2008

69

15

39

44

167

Total

304

217

258

172

951

 

To place this further into perspective, data from individual housing needs assessments undertaken individually by the East Kent authorities between 2002 and 2004 indicated a collective need for 4701 affordable homes annually over a five-year period to meet existing and projected housing need. Offset against an annual average of 1796 re-lets of existing affordable housing, this leaves an annual shortfall of 2905 affordable homes across East Kent (See Table 4)

 

Table 4 – Annual shortfall of affordable housing

 

Canterbury

Dover

Shepway

Thanet

Total

Annual need

1219

814

1234

1434

4701

Less annual average re-lets

443

492

329

532

1796

Annual shortfall

776

322

905

902

2905

 

It is not surprising therefore that the private rented sector is seen to have a significant role to play in preventing homelessness, through the provision of both temporary and permanent accommodation.

 

2.3 Homelessness in East Kent

There has been a significant drop in the number of homelessness applications made in East Kent in the past five years (see Table 5).

 

Applications peaked between 2003 and 2004. This is due partly to the initial impact of the Homelessness Act 2002, which extended the category of applicant that had priority need. However, with an increasing emphasis on the prevention of homelessness through the Housing Options model of service delivery (see section 3.2), and particular initiatives such as the Rent Deposit Scheme for example (see section 3.5), the number of applications received (and those accepted) has decreased steadily over the past five years.

 

Table 5 - East Kent homelessness statistics 2003 – 2008

 

Click on chart to enlarge
 

The number of households accepted as homeless across East Kent peaked in 2003-2004 at 925. In the following four years this figure reduced by just over 64% to 332. It will be noted from Table 6 that the two most common causes of homelessness were eviction by a family member or friend which has risen proportionally (35% in 2003-2004 compared with 36% in 2007-2008), and also loss of rented or tied accommodation, although this has decreased proportionally by some 4%.  Loss of accommodation due to relationship breakdown has also risen proportionally, however the number of homeless people leaving institutions has reduced. A breakdown of this data by individual authority is provided at appendix 2.

 

Table 6  – Reasons for homelessness – East Kent

Category / Year

03-04

04-05

05-06

06-07

07-08

Relatives/friends unable to accommodate

326

255

181

137

120

Relationship breakdown

52

42

37

12

39

Violence / harassment

152

128

100

57

31

Mortgage default

9

4

8

17

14

Rent arrears

43

26

21

10

23

Loss of rented or tied accommodation

235

209

124

73

71

Asylum seekers

2

0

1

3

0

Care / institution leaver

42

31

14

24

9

Other

64

34

28

12

25

Total

925

729

514

345

332

 

Table 7 illustrates the priority needs category for each household that was accepted as homeless. The majority of acceptances were for households with dependent children, but of significant concern, is the proportional increase in the number of 16/17 year-olds accepted as homeless (8% in 2004 to 13% in 2008). A breakdown of this data by individual authority is provided at appendix 2.

 

The proportion of older people has reduced by some 50%; however acceptances due to physical disability, mental illness/disability and drug/alcohol dependency have remained proportionally consistent.

 

Table 7  - Priority needs categories – East Kent

Category / Year

03-04

04-05

05-06

06-07

07-08

Emergency

13

5

14

2

6

Dependent children

508

380

248

143

165

Pregnancy

68

57

45

39

36

16/17 year-old

77

56

57

56

44

Care leaver aged 18-20

8

9

3

10

4

Old age

37

36

16

12

9

Physical disability

71

49

27

15

21

Mental illness / disability

74

50

34

27

29

Other (drug / alcohol dependency)

10

19

12

13

1

Vulnerable - care leaver

2

2

0

0

0

Vulnerable - HM forces

1

0

1

0

0

Vulnerable - custody / remand

12

4

1

2

2

Vulnerable - violence

44

62

57

26

15

Total

925

729

514

345

332

 

2.4 The key drivers

Several issues will have a significant impact on the East Kent housing market in the immediate future - and potentially therefore, levels of homelessness:

 

  • The channel tunnel domestic rail link – will access Canterbury, Dover, Folkestone and Ramsgate and will have an inevitable impact on property prices, as the districts become more attractive to investors and London becomes more accessible
  • The impact of the “credit crunch” – the sudden reduction in the availability of loans for new borrowers and increased mortgage costs for existing borrowers at the end of fixed-term agreements has resulted in a downward pressure on house prices and land values. There have been more repossessions as overstretched homeowners have been confronted by higher monthly payments, and demand for new homes has dropped. As a result, developers have built fewer new homes, which means that affordable housing completions have fallen significantly short of target.
  • The South East Plan (see section 1.3) – proposes future levels of housing provision which have significant implications for East Kent
  • The impact of growth within Ashford and the Thames Gateway
  • Changing demographics – the age distribution of the population arising from births and deaths; changing patterns of household formation due to marriage, divorce and childbirth; and the number and composition of new households arising from migration to and from the sub-region.

 

2.5 Accommodation-based services for homeless households in East Kent

East Kent has a limited amount of short-term accommodation for homeless people, which is unevenly distributed across the sub-region. As a result, demand is continuously in excess of supply. This is frequently compounded by a shortage of suitable permanent accommodation for service users to move on to, and consequently many will occupy short-term accommodation for far longer than necessary. This has the added disadvantage of blocking access to these limited resources for other homeless households. Table 8 summarises the short-term accommodation currently available.

 

Table 8  – Accommodation-based services for homeless households (by bed space) – East Kent

Service

Canterbury

Dover

Shepway

Thanet

Total

Night shelter

28

-

-

-

28

Homeless hostel

16

27

9

20

72

Single homeless (high support)

-

12

11

-

23

Women’s refuge

12

6

7

12

37

Young people

22

12

-

23

57

Move-on accommodation

18

-

-

-

18

Supported housing for homeless people

38

-

-

-

38

Supported housing – substance/alcohol misuse

13

-

11

-

24

Total

147

57

38

55

297